Japanese crossword «Folks»
| Size: 20x20 | Picture: | Difficulty: | Added: | 16.10.19 | Author: Riliya |
COMMENTS
No seriously I was hoping to find things with this subject matter, I love it.
reply
show: 1 🗨
One more time for the people in the back:
TRANS RIGHTS
replyTRANS RIGHTS
Trans Rights do not exist because transism does not exist. There is no scientific evidence for it.
replyshow: 2 🗨
At least 1.4 million trans people in the US alone would disagree with you. ( https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/transgender-population-by-state )
However, if you would like more evidence; I looked up "science behind trans people" on google and this article was the first result. It's not hard to find actual scientific evidence for trans people's existence if you actually look for it.
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
replyHowever, if you would like more evidence; I looked up "science behind trans people" on google and this article was the first result. It's not hard to find actual scientific evidence for trans people's existence if you actually look for it.
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/stop-using-phony-science-to-justify-transphobia/
show: 1 🗨
Simone D Sun is an activist who cares more about her hypothesis than the scientific standard. The 1.4 number you quoted was double just two years ago by the Williams Institute which is an unreliable political think tank. Regardless, if there were 45 billion self-described "transpeople" there would still be zero actual transpeople because there is no evidence of a gendered brain, no evidence of a successful transition to the opposite gender, and plenty of evidence to the contrary. I'm a fan of the scientific method. Not institutes. Especially institutes which oppose the scientific method. You should also be careful not to share op-ed pieces and pass it off as peer-reviewed meta-analysis.
reply