Japanese crossword «Math teacher»
| Size: 30x20 | Picture: | Difficulty: | Added: | 06.03.15 |
Share this crossword:
COMMENTS
Great picture. I suppose calculus would be too much to expect...
reply
show: 4 🗨
show: 3 🗨
I guess I should say it = 2 in every *finite* base > 2.
Don't really know if there's such a thing as an infinite base, but just in case, I wanted my comment to cover all the bases.
replyDon't really know if there's such a thing as an infinite base, but just in case, I wanted my comment to cover all the bases.
show: 2 🗨
Good question
It would mean assigning a different symbol for each integer. since the number of symbols would be infinite the number one-zero (whatever the symbols for 1 and 0 are) is never reached. Somewhat pointless.
replyIt would mean assigning a different symbol for each integer. since the number of symbols would be infinite the number one-zero (whatever the symbols for 1 and 0 are) is never reached. Somewhat pointless.
show: 1 🗨
N[x] is the numbering system you are describing, and is actually quite often studied - the polynomial N[x] is just a way of articulating it using our finite number of symbols (e.g., 114,421 in decimal would be N[114,421] rather than coming up with 114,422 total symbols to reach that point (zero being the first symbol of course).
replyHands down, this is the best result on the site, by far! Yes, I meant to include two superlative clauses!
No other result will ever be better!
OK, as a longtime member of the referenced occupation, I *might* be a little biased.
However, I am convinced that there will never be enough bias amongst the members to counteract the level and amount of vitriol that the subject matter gets.
replyNo other result will ever be better!
OK, as a longtime member of the referenced occupation, I *might* be a little biased.
However, I am convinced that there will never be enough bias amongst the members to counteract the level and amount of vitriol that the subject matter gets.
show: 1 🗨